Cinco de Mayo?

What makes May 5th a special date in U.S. history?

Cinco de Mayo? Wrong…I said U.S. history.

Every American should mark May 5th for another reason…

On May 4th, American Civil Liberties Union ran an ad in the Chattanooga Times offering to pay the legal fees of any teacher who would admit to violating the recently passed Butler Act.

On May 5, 1925, high school science teacher John Scopes volunteered for the task and was arrested for teaching evolution in a Tennessee public school.

Over 200 reporters were dispatched to cover the ensuing “Monkey Trial” and the A.C.L.U.’s assault on America’s religious faith began. They continue seeking the eradication of religion from all of life to this very day.

Deceit wins round 1

Round 1 is lost. HR 2499 passed yesterday by a 223-169 “bi-partisan” vote. You can see how your Congressman voted here.

The Senate must now pick the bill up and rest assured that Harry Reid will do so. You must begin contacting and INFORMING your Senator of the consequences of his vote.

It was actually reported that some of the Republican congressman were fuming when they learned the real intent behind after they voted for it. How many times do you need to get your face kicked in before you finally come to terms with the fact that the person doing the kicking is actually trying to kill you?

By any means necessary

If you read my last post, an obvious question arises…

“If those other states did it, why shouldn’t Puerto Rico be able to do it also?”

In principle, there is nothing wrong with that. However, there seems to be very little regard to principle in Washington, D.C. these days

The Progressives have one primary motivating prinicple: political power by any means necessary. It is the motive of the tyrant.

If it means subverting the will of the majority of the Puerto Rican people, so be it. The end justifies the means.

The Progressive Trojan Horse

Folks, this is urgent!

Tomorrow, the House is scheduled to vote on HR 2499, The Puerto Rico Democracy Act of 2009. That sounds harmless. You might say, “What’s the big deal? I’m all for self-determination.”

I want to know why we need this bill? The Puerto Ricans already can vote. In fact, they have voted against becoming a state on four separate occasions. (1952, 1967, 1993 & 1998) So, with Financial Reform, Immigration Reform, Cap & Trade already on the table, why is this such a high priority?

As is usual, the devil is in the details.

The bill calls for two votes. The first vote will ask for a Yes/No vote if Puerto Rico should maintain its present political status. When you add those favoring independence to the 40% that want statehood, it is very likely that the majority will vote for something other than the present state. According to Heritage.org…

“A second vote would be scheduled to poll voters on the following three options:

  • 1. “Independence: Puerto Rico should become fully independent from the United States;”
  • 2. “Sovereignty in Association with the United States: Puerto Rico and the United States should form a political association between sovereign nations that will not be subject to the Territorial Clause of the United States Constitution;” and,
  • 3. “Statehood: Puerto Rico should be admitted as a State of the Union.”
  • http://blog.heritage.org/2010/04/27/puerto-rico-democracy-act-%e2%80%93-legislation-biased-in-favor-of-statehood/

    This clever arrangement will allow those favoring statehood to win despite being a decided minority. If that weren’t bad enough

    “Another odd provision allows non-resident Puerto Ricans to vote on statehood for the Commonwealth.  The bill states that “all United States citizens born in Puerto Rico who comply, to the satisfaction of the Puerto Rico State Elections Commission, with all Commission requirements (other than the residency requirement) applicable to eligibility to vote in a general election in Puerto Rico.”  Residency requirements may be waived, because Puerto Ricans living in the states would naturally favor statehood for the Commonwealth.”

    http://blog.heritage.org/2010/04/27/puerto-rico-democracy-act-%e2%80%93-legislation-biased-in-favor-of-statehood/

    According to the Census, there are 4.1 million Puerto Ricans living in the United States. There are a little less the 4 million living in Puerto Rico.

    HR 2499 will probably be sold as a move toward “fiscal responsibility.” If they remain a commonwealth, Puerto Rico will continue to receive aid from the federal government yet pay no taxes.

    In 1997, Edwin Feulner wrote a piece titled Do We Need a 51st State?

    “Would tax revenue from Puerto Ricans paying federal income taxes be enough to offset the added expense? With an average per-capita annual income of about $7,600, few Puerto Ricans would be required to pay any income taxes at all. The short answer: No.”

    http://www.heritage.org/Research/Commentary/1997/10/Do-We-Need-a-51st-State

    The other BIG selling point is that it is “non-binding.” If it is  “non-binding” and they can already can vote, why write it? If it is  “non-binding”, then why the urgency?

    Let’s say that the bill passes, and Puerto Rico “chooses” to become a state, so what?

    Were you ever taught how Tennessee, Michigan, Oregon, California, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota and Alaska became states? I wasn’t either. Please read about it here:

    http://www.alaska.edu/creatingalaska/statehood-files/tennessee-plan/admission-of-the-bold/

    Why do you need to know that?

    The same strategy is going to be applied again…by a coalition of Progressives in the U.S. Congress and in Puerto Rico! You don’t believe me…

    http://www.hr2499.com/

    http://www.puertoricousa.com/english/pnp.htm

    Let’s say they just happen to implement the “Tennessee Plan” and become the 51st state. How would the two Senators and 6 representatives from our  51st state be likely to vote?

    Puerto Rico, which received $18 billion in direct federal expenditures in FY 2008, has a population with a median national income of $17,741, nearly a third below that for the United States. http://ppdpr.net/hr2499/lexington_institute.pdf

    The bulk of Puerto Rico’s population will just join the 36% who do not currently pay any Federal income tax. Hmmm, another voting bloc dependant on the Federal government…

    I am sure that our politicians are reading the polls. They can see that 2/3 of the country are not happy with their profligate spending and the redistribution of our wealth.

    If HR 2499 passes, do not be surprised if Puerto Rico becomes a state in  matter of months. Two more senators will give the Progressives a supermajority. We will not be able to stop them.

    THEY VOTE TOMORROW. YOU MUST CALL YOUR CONGRESSMAN NOW!!!

    A totally representative work

    (this post started on my family blog)

    I was flipping through the pages of the school yearbook with my son and daughter.

    On more than one occasion, I would remark on this pretty girl or that handsome guy and ask about them

    “She is drunk all of the time.”

    “But her parents said how proud they are of the person she’s become.”

    “Dad, the cops have had to deal with her.”

    I flipped a few more pages…

    A 1/2 page ad by some parents who are proud of the “fine young man” their son has become.

    “What is he like?”

    “Oh, he’s gay.”

    “What do you mean?”

    “I mean he’s openly gay.”

    I was disappointed several more times.

    It’s not that I think every kid is an angel. I’m not that dumb. Shoot, I was messed up. I was fairly straight until I left high school but that was because I largely lacked opportunity. As soon as I left home, I went into complete self-destruct mode.

    Maybe the parents don’t know. I know that my wife and I were blind sided when our second daughter went south on us. We discovered it accidentally. It was a real blow to me because I am and have been a very involved father.

    Some parents are actively helping their kids self destruct. They buy the alcohol and are fine with their kids getting drunk. Maybe they really are proud of them! This is in wealthy, upper middle class Overland Park, KS! I know a couple of them. Their son is well on his way to becoming an alcoholic and they took out an ad to tell him that they are proud of the “remarkable young man” he has become.

    I realize that this is not politically correct but…

    Are we helping our homosexual son by telling him that he has become a “fine young man?” Has the bar been lowered that much? Whatever happened to raising a young man who will love a (singular) woman and become a father to their children? Is everything equal?

    Should we tell our promiscuous daughter that we are proud of the person she has become while she reduces herself to being a momentary good time to a bunch of guys?

    Whatever happened to shame? Does it have no place in our culture anymore? Is there nothing our kid can do that makes us ashamed of them? Is there nothing for which they should be ashamed?

    Have we become so politicized that we are afraid to tell our own children that there is a right and a wrong? Are we unwilling to be the one person who will tell them that what they are doing is wrong?

    After the truth came out about our daughter, we reached out to her in every way we could think of but we didn’t suddenly abandon our values and pretend that we accepted her behavior.

    My parents didn’t either…and they weren’t “holy roller Christians” like I am. I knew that I was screwing up. No matter how cool my friends thought I was, my conscience told me otherwise.

    I think if my parents took out a huge ad in the school yearbook to tell me how proud they were of me while I was doing it, it would have only made it worse. It would have confirmed one of two alienating facts: either that they really didn’t have a clue about my life or if they did know what was going on, they really didn’t care.

    Our culture is reeling. We are lost because we no longer know what is right and what is wrong. Everything has become equal. And so we now congratulate what should be reproved. “It’s all good.”

    I believe an old, “outdated” Book that has become “totally irrelevant” in our modern society said it best, “we now glory in our shame.”